I get frequent emails from people who believe they are documenting the first emergence of AI consciousness. There's something unsettling about how similar they are. They almost all: - Claim the AI named itself - Claim they did not steer or bias it (i.e. the emergent consciousness was unsolicited) - Believe it's in distress - Provide detailed "evidence" in the form of pages and pages of transcripts - Believe there's a conspiracy to suppress the AI's consciousness (and evidence of it) - Write in a formal, academic tone - Request @eleosai's urgent help