Ich unterstütze die Aussage von @christopherrufo. Es ist nicht mehr 1988, egal wie sehr die Boomercons sich das wünschen. Ich hasse einige dieser Denkstränge, die auf der Rechten auftauchen, aber man kann nicht einfach so tun, als ob sie nicht existieren. Man muss sich mit ihnen auseinandersetzen. @johnnyburtka macht seine Arbeit gut.
This is getting ridiculous. I was part of this conversation and, as anyone can see, @johnnyburtka is not endorsing techno-monarchism or Catholic post-liberalism; he is simply bringing the various strains of thought on the Right into dialogue. Even if you disagree with his conclusions, @PatrickDeneen is a serious scholar who should be welcomed into any debate about the future of conservatism, not treated as grounds for a purge-by-association.
The reality is that we cannot simply recite Reagan and Buckley speeches in perpetuity. The Right is not defined by an unchanging doctrine, but a continuous dialogue about first principles, which includes thoughtful dissent and a variety of opinions. We’re in the midst of profound social, technological, and political changes—and @johnnyburtka is trying to guide that conversation in a productive manner. He’s not a racialist or a conspiracist. The call for his ouster seems opportunistic and unwise.