What makes Timeboost interesting isn’t revenue scale. It’s revenue quality. Arbitrum is proving you can monetize blockspace without taxing everyone equally. Timeboost only activates when users explicitly choose priority. That’s a very different model from blanket fee extraction. A few things stand out: > Revenue is opt-in, not forced > Fee pressure is episodic, not constant > Core users aren’t priced out during normal conditions From a market-structure lens, this is huge. It keeps @Arbitrum competitive as an execution surface while still giving the DAO a recurring cash flow tied to real demand for speed. From a valuation lens, $8M annualized with minimal UX degradation is meaningful. Not because it’s huge today, but because it scales with moments of stress and opportunity, not idle traffic. That’s disciplined monetization. And discipline is rare in blockspace markets.