Trendaavat aiheet
#
Bonk Eco continues to show strength amid $USELESS rally
#
Pump.fun to raise $1B token sale, traders speculating on airdrop
#
Boop.Fun leading the way with a new launchpad on Solana.

Jake Chervinsky
Lawyer, but not yours. CLO @variantfund. Board @fund_defi + @blockchainassn. Ex @compoundfinance. Posts are not legal or financial advice.
The banks demanded the exclusion for yield-bearing stablecoins in the GENIUS Act. Now they're upset that the language they asked for doesn't screw over stablecoin holders hard enough.
Sorry you guys did a bad job negotiating your regulatory moat. Try lobbying better next time!

Cointelegraph11 tuntia sitten
🇺🇸 UPDATE: The Bank Policy Institute urged Congress to close the GENIUS Act stablecoin interest loophole to prevent deposit flight.

24,4K
Jake Chervinsky kirjasi uudelleen
The most fundamental part of the digital asset economy is the personal empowerment and agency that comes from self-custody & decentralized finance.
Today @fund_defi introduced the DeFi Education Foundation. I'm proud to be on its board with my friends @amandatums & @m_mosier_.
33,11K
Jake Chervinsky kirjasi uudelleen
Today, I share a mid-year letter explaining the important work that @fund_defi has done since January. I’ve been thinking a lot about DEF's unique position as the only DeFi-focused, nonpartisan nonprofit research & advocacy org at this particular moment in digital asset policy 👇
17,03K
Jake Chervinsky kirjasi uudelleen
LIVE NOW - The Trial That Could Decide The Future of Crypto
@jchervinsky and @amandatums join us to unpack the @rstormsf verdict—what it means for DeFi, why Section 1960 is a looming threat to open-source developers, and the strong grounds for appeal.
We discuss the legal, political, and legislative paths forward, the role of Congress in protecting developers, and how the crypto industry can mobilize to prevent future prosecutions.
--------------
TIMESTAMPS
0:00 Intro
0:24 Verdict First Impressions
4:22 Was it Successful?
6:26 Second Trial?
9:47 Money Transmitter Debate
15:20 Optimistic Setup?
19:56 Levels of Precedent
26:04 What’s Next?
30:26 Crypto Industry Agency
34:01 Regulatory Acts
37:33 Two Paths
44:35 Trump Administration
49:02 Upcoming Administrations
53:45 Call to Action
56:55 Closing & Disclaimers
11,58K
Jake Chervinsky kirjasi uudelleen
It's 2030
You're a merchant receiving payment from a customer. They pay with USDC on CircleChain but your payment termainl only receives StripeUSD on StripeChain.
But once you get StripeUSD, you want to transfer it to your account with Bank of America, so you need to transfer it to BofAUSD on BofAChain.
But wait, you go and pay your supplier. The problem is, they custody with JPMorgan. So then you need to get your BofAUSD on BofAChain to JPMorganUSD on JPMorganChain.
But JPMorganChain is permissioned, so you need to route it through a special intermediary... and so on
Is this the future we're headed toward?
11,82K
Remember this when Roman Storm files post-trial motions or an appeal. The judge instructed the jury incorrectly on Section 1960, so they convicted him based on a misunderstanding of the law (that it covers non-custodial software developers; it does not). This is ripe for appeal.

paulgrewal.eth31.7.2025
Jury instructions do indeed matter. Civil or criminal, it's in many ways the most fraught part of a trial for a judge. Both sides are pushing hard on every word. The record is in flux until the very end of closing arguments. And on error could lead to this-- the verdict is fundamentally tainted. A judge's worst nightmare.
21,7K
Remember this when Roman Storm files post-trial motions or an appeal. The judge instructed the jury incorrectly on Section 1960, so they convicted him based on a misunderstanding of the law (that it applies non-custodial software developers; it does not). This is ripe for appeal.

paulgrewal.eth31.7.2025
Jury instructions do indeed matter. Civil or criminal, it's in many ways the most fraught part of a trial for a judge. Both sides are pushing hard on every word. The record is in flux until the very end of closing arguments. And on error could lead to this-- the verdict is fundamentally tainted. A judge's worst nightmare.
1K
Johtavat
Rankkaus
Suosikit
Ketjussa trendaava
Trendaa X:ssä
Viimeisimmät suosituimmat rahoitukset
Merkittävin